Choosing between the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 and the Glock 17 is a common dilemma for both seasoned firearm enthusiasts and newcomers alike. Both are highly regarded striker-fired pistols, but they cater to slightly different preferences and needs. This in-depth comparison will analyze key features, performance characteristics, and overall suitability for various applications, helping you make an informed decision.
Key Differences: A Quick Overview
Before diving into the specifics, here's a concise summary of the core distinctions between the M&P 2.0 and the Glock 17:
| Feature | Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 | Glock 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Grip Texture | Aggressive, textured grip with interchangeable backstraps | Relatively smooth, slightly textured grip |
| Trigger | Generally considered smoother and more refined | Known for its crisp, consistent, but somewhat stiff trigger pull |
| Ambidextrous Features | Ambidextrous slide stop and magazine release | Ambidextrous slide stop (optional on some models), magazine release typically not ambidextrous |
| Sight Options | Wide range of aftermarket sight options available | Extensive aftermarket sight support |
| Price | Often slightly more expensive than comparable Glock models | Generally more affordable |
Detailed Comparison: Ergonomics, Features, and Performance
Let's delve deeper into the individual aspects that set these two pistols apart:
1. Ergonomics and Grip
The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 boasts a highly regarded ergonomic design. Its aggressive texturing provides a secure grip, even in wet or stressful conditions. The interchangeable backstraps allow for customization to fit a wide range of hand sizes, enhancing comfort and control. This makes it a strong contender for concealed carry, where a secure grip is paramount.
The Glock 17, while functional, offers a less aggressive grip texture. This can be beneficial for some shooters who prefer a less abrasive feel, but it may not offer the same level of grip security as the M&P 2.0 in challenging conditions.
2. Trigger
The M&P 2.0's trigger is often praised for its smoother pull and shorter reset compared to the Glock 17. This can translate to faster follow-up shots and improved accuracy, especially for those accustomed to a lighter, more responsive trigger.
The Glock 17's trigger, while known for its reliability and consistent performance, typically has a more pronounced break and a slightly heavier pull weight. While this might feel less refined to some, many shooters appreciate the consistent trigger pull for accuracy and reliability.
3. Features and Ambidextrous Controls
Both pistols offer a variety of features, but the M&P 2.0 edges ahead with its fully ambidextrous slide stop and magazine release. This is a significant advantage for left-handed shooters or those who prefer ambidextrous controls.
The Glock 17 typically only includes an ambidextrous slide stop (though some models may lack this feature). The magazine release is typically not ambidextrous, posing a potential disadvantage for left-handed users.
4. Accuracy and Reliability
Both the M&P 2.0 and the Glock 17 are known for their outstanding reliability and accuracy. These are workhorses that are built to perform under pressure. Minor variations in accuracy might depend on the individual pistol and shooter's proficiency.
5. Aftermarket Support and Customization
Both pistols have extensive aftermarket support. Finding holsters, sights, and other accessories for either model is easy. The sheer number of options available allows for significant customization to fit personal preferences.
6. Cost
Generally, the Glock 17 tends to have a lower price point than the M&P 2.0. This makes the Glock a more budget-friendly option, though the price difference may not be substantial.
Conclusion: Which Pistol Is Right for You?
The choice between the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 and the Glock 17 ultimately boils down to individual preferences and needs.
-
Choose the M&P 2.0 if: You prioritize a comfortable, customizable grip, a smoother trigger, and fully ambidextrous controls. If concealed carry is a primary consideration, the M&P 2.0's superior ergonomics could be a deciding factor.
-
Choose the Glock 17 if: You prefer a more affordable option with a well-established reputation for reliability and a consistent trigger pull. Simplicity and ease of maintenance are also key considerations.
Remember to always handle firearms safely and responsibly. Rent or try both pistols at a range if possible before making a final purchasing decision. Consider your individual shooting style and hand size to determine the best fit for your needs.
