Choosing between the Smith & Wesson 638 and 642 can feel overwhelming, especially for first-time buyers of concealed carry firearms. Both are incredibly popular J-frame revolvers, known for their reliability and compact size, but subtle differences exist that significantly impact their suitability for different users. This in-depth comparison will help you determine which model best fits your needs and preferences.
Key Differences: Material and Trigger
The most significant distinction between the 638 and 642 lies in their construction materials:
-
Smith & Wesson 638: This model boasts a lightweight aluminum alloy frame. This results in a lighter carry weight, making it less cumbersome for all-day concealed carry. However, the aluminum frame can be more susceptible to wear and tear over time.
-
Smith & Wesson 642: Constructed from stainless steel, the 642 offers superior durability and resistance to corrosion. This translates to a longer lifespan and resilience against the elements. The downside is a noticeably heavier carry weight.
Another critical factor is the trigger:
- Trigger Pull: Both models are known for their relatively heavy double-action trigger pulls. This is a common characteristic of J-frames designed for safety and reliability. While the exact trigger pull weight can vary between individual firearms, expect a significant amount of pressure required to fire. Professional gunsmithing can improve trigger pull, but this should be considered carefully and only undertaken by qualified professionals.
Beyond the Basics: Considerations for Choosing
While the material and trigger are primary differences, other factors should influence your decision:
1. Concealed Carry Considerations:
-
Weight: The lighter aluminum 638 is arguably better for all-day concealed carry, particularly for individuals with smaller frames or who prioritize comfort. The heavier 642, while more durable, might prove less comfortable for extended periods.
-
Recoil: The lighter weight of the 638 means you'll feel more recoil with each shot. The heavier 642 mitigates recoil, making it potentially more pleasant to shoot, especially for beginners.
2. Environmental Factors:
- Corrosion Resistance: The stainless steel 642 is far superior when facing harsh weather conditions, sweat, or other elements that could lead to corrosion. The aluminum 638 requires more meticulous care and cleaning to prevent damage.
3. Maintenance and Lifespan:
- Durability: The 642’s stainless steel construction generally ensures a longer lifespan and requires less frequent maintenance compared to the aluminum 638.
Which Model is Right for You?
The "better" revolver depends entirely on your individual needs and priorities:
-
Choose the Smith & Wesson 638 if: You prioritize lightweight concealed carry and comfort above all else. You’re willing to take extra care to maintain the firearm and understand the increased recoil.
-
Choose the Smith & Wesson 642 if: Durability, corrosion resistance, and reduced recoil are your top priorities. You're prepared to carry a slightly heavier firearm.
Ultimately, handling both revolvers (if possible) at a gun range or store is crucial before making a decision. This allows you to assess the weight, trigger pull, and overall feel to determine which firearm best fits your hand and shooting style. Remember to always practice safe firearm handling and seek professional instruction.
